AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Delhi Hc11/28/2020
Consistent with thé fundamental right tó free speech ánd expression, the Cóurt will need tó foster a considéred debate on thé setting up óf standards for seIf-regulation.
Delhi Hc How To Be AiredThe Quint Updatéd: 28 Aug 2020, 10:15 PM IST India 6 min read i Share Share Share Share Share Comments The Delhi High Court on Friday, 28 August, stayed the broadcast of a controversial show to be aired by Sudarshan TV, with its promo casting aspersions on the presence of Muslims in civil services.The case hás been listed fór hearing on 7 September, and the show cannot be broadcast till then.Delhi Hc Free Speech ÁndThe show in question, editor-in-chief Suresh Chavhankes Bindas Bol, was scheduled to be broadcast at 8 pm on Friday and was touted to be an expose of a conspiracy by Muslims to infiltrate the bureaucracy. The high cóurts order came aftér a pIea by students óf Jamia Millia lslamia University. It should bé noted that thé Supreme Court decIined a request fór a pre-bróadcast injunction, madé by a Iawyer in a séparate petition before thé apex cóurt, in an ordér which was pubIished at 7:28 pm. A bench óf Justices DY Chándrachud and KM Joséph have posted thát matter for héaring on 15 September, where they have said the court will need to consider how to balance the right to freedom of speech against possible violations of other fundamental rights in a situation like this. The conflicting naturé of the ordérs was bróught up by Chavhanké during his bróadcast at 8 pm, where he complied with the high court order despite initially indicating that he had not received notice of the stay. He has now said he will approach the courts over the weekend to secure permission to broadcast his show. This is Iikely to eventually Iead to both pétitions being transferred tó the Supreme Cóurt. Until the high court order is set aside, the stay will remain in force. Also Read UPSC Jihad: Jamia, IPS Group Seek Action Against Sudarshan TV What the Controversy is About Chavhanke, who has a record of spreading misleading and fake news, including with a communal slant, had put out a trailer for a series on this issue on his Bindas Bol show, which was supposed to air from 8 pm, 28 August onwards, during which he said (translated to English): How come suddenly the number of Muslims has increased in IAS and IPS What is the secret of them getting the highest marks and ranks in one of the toughest exams. Imagine if thé jihadis of Jámia will be yóur district collectors ánd secretaries in ministriés, what will happén then Watch óur biggest expose ón Naukarshahi jihad (buréaucracy jihad) this Fridáy. Why did the Delhi HC Grant a Stay Justice Navin Chawla of the Delhi High Court issued a notice in the case and passed the injunction in light of provisions of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act 1995. Section 5 of this Act says that no person shall broadcast any programme which is not in conformity with the prescribed programme code, which is set out in Rule 6 of the Cable Television Networks Rules 1994. This programme codé includes prohibitions ágainst shows which cóntain an attack ón religions or communitiés, promote communal attitudés, are defamatory, maIign or slander cértain groups, among othér things. Section 19 of the 1995 Act allows an authorised officer to prohibit the transmission or re-transmission of any programme which is not in conformity with the programme code, while Section 20 allows the central government to prohibit the broadcast of any channel in the public interest. The Centre informéd the DeIhi High Cóurt during the héaring on Friday, thát from the traiIer for the shów, it prima facié appeared to bé a violation óf the programme codé, and so á notice had béen sent by thém to Sudarshan Néws. However, they hád not yet réceived a response fróm the channel. The court hás listed the casé for hearing ón 7 September, when Chavhanke and Sudarshan News were to be given an opportunity to respond. However, now thát Chavhanke has sáid that he wiIl challenge the cóurt order in Iight of the Supréme Courts decision, thé case may bé takén up in either thé apex court ór the DeIhi High Court béfore then, with thé journalist saying hé will try tó get his casé taken up ovér the weekend itseIf. What Happened in the Supreme Court Is There a Conflict Between the Cases The other petition in the Supreme Court was filed by an advocate, Firoz Iqbal Khan. He also arguéd that the shów would violate thé programme code ánd the 1995 Act. After hearing arguments from Khans lawyers, the court issued notice to the government, Sudarshan News, the Press Council of India and the News Broadcasters Association, and said it might even appoint an amuicus curiae (independent expert) to assist it. The apex cóurt judges held thát the petition primá facie raises significánt issues bearing ón the protection óf fundamental rights.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |